Since November 2026, both loopholes that allowed asylum seekers to simultaneously apply for a green card through marriage while keeping an open asylum case have been closed in the US. The court has prohibited the administrative closure of asylum cases, and judges have introduced restrictions on postponements. Now the outcome largely depends on how exactly the applicant entered the country.

What changed and why

Until recently, there was a popular scheme: apply for asylum, then meet a US citizen, register the marriage, and apply for a green card while keeping the asylum case open. Judges could freeze the case or close it administratively if the applicant began legalization through marriage.

In June 2026, a court in Texas prohibited the administrative closure of asylum cases. From that moment on, a judge can only render two decisions: approval or deportation. No intermediate stage.

Even more restrictive was a confidential instruction for judges issued in September 2026. Judges were prohibited from granting postponements in asylum case reviews, even if the applicant was simultaneously undergoing legalization through marriage. Both loopholes have been closed.

Who this affects and how exactly

The impact of the new rules varies depending on the method of entry into the United States.

Arrived on a visa (tourist, student, or other)

For this group, almost nothing has changed. If you are at the asylum interview stage or even if you have already been denied and your case is being reviewed in court, the judge has the right to consider your legalization through marriage regardless of the open asylum case. Both cases fall under the jurisdiction of one agency (USCIS), which simplifies the process.

Received parole through the CBP1 system

In this case, real difficulties arise. You are automatically in a deportation process, and your case is being reviewed in court (not at USCIS, but in immigration court). If the asylum court hearing occurs before the marriage interview, and you receive a denial without filing an appeal, deportation could happen before you receive an invitation for the green card interview.

If you have filed an appeal and it buys time, and meanwhile you received approval for a green card through marriage, then with an attorney’s help, the asylum case can be closed and you can legalize through marriage.

However, if you are deported, you will be placed under an entry ban (from three to ten years depending on the length of illegal stay). In this case, a fiancée visa won’t help—returning through marriage will be very difficult.

The most difficult situation: entered without inspection

For those who crossed the border outside a port of entry (via river, fence, tunnels), legalization through marriage is now practically impossible. Previously, you needed to close the case administratively and obtain a waiver of inadmissibility to be eligible for a green card. Now the first option is prohibited, and the second loophole has become much more difficult.

For such applicants, only one realistic path remains: focus on winning the asylum case. Marriage no longer provides a way out, but asylum still remains open to everyone, regardless of how they entered. This requires serious preparation: a strong account of persecution in your home country, supporting documents, an understanding of how your situation fits the definition of a refugee.

How to act in each case

If you arrived on a visa: continue working on the marriage green card and asylum case in parallel. There are no restrictions, and even at the court stage, a marriage interview can be considered.

If you have parole: assess the timeline. If the marriage interview can be conducted before the asylum hearing, apply quickly. If the court hearing is already scheduled, make sure you have a prepared appeal ready in case of a denial to buy time.

If you crossed the border outside a port of entry: forget about marriage as a means of legalization. Put maximum effort into preparing your asylum case. This is your only realistic path to remain legally in the United States.

Вывеска иммиграционного суда или USCIS в здании федерального агентства

Why judges introduced new rules

The restrictions are not accidental. They are designed to prevent asylum seekers from using parallel green card applications as a tactic to delay the review of their case. Each postponed case takes up court resources. Now the applicant must choose: either asylum or marriage, and this choice has real consequences.