If an extension application under the Super Priority Service hasn’t been decided, and the Home Office sends a letter saying the case is ‘complex’ and has been removed from Super Priority, the processing time becomes uncertain: the standard service has no fixed deadline, and waiting can take six months or even a year. The extra payment does not guarantee a decision within 24 hours. In the case described, applicants had already waited more than a month and a half without a substantive answer.
What removal from Super Priority means
In the case described, the applicants applied for a third extension paying a £2,000 surcharge for the Super Priority Service. Such applications are usually decided within 24 hours if the case is straightforward and all documents have been uploaded. However, if the Home Office believes documents are missing or were not uploaded, it removes the case from the Super Priority Service and sends a letter stating the case has been moved to the standard service.
For the standard service, as the material states, there is no set deadline. So processing can take six months or even more than a year.
Why the case might have been deemed complex
In the case described, the applicants had already extended their visa twice using the same documents, and both times the decision came within a day. The third application received a letter about complexity with no further details: it did not specify which documents were missing or what exactly in the submission raised questions.
According to the analysis, the reason could be one of two things: either the completeness of the documents, or some aspect of the submission that seemed complicated. There was no clarification from the department, so it’s impossible to tell from the letter what needs to be fixed.
Super Priority Service vs. standard service
How the two options for reviewing an extension application differ, according to the material
| Super Priority Service | Standard service | |
|---|---|---|
| Decision time | 24 hours | No set deadline |
| Payment | £2,000 (surcharge) | No surcharge |
| Possible timeframe | — | 6 months or more, sometimes a year |
What to do if there’s no substantive answer
Repeated letters from the lawyer requesting a status update, according to the description, produced no results. The analysis recommends waiting and not counting on speeding things up through extra payment once a case has already been moved to the standard service.
One option mentioned in the material is to wait for the decision and assess next steps based on its content. No alternative way to speed up the process was identified in the case described.
Comments
Reader experience is useful, but it is not advice: check the rules on the official site.
No account needed: click Sign in, type any name, and you are done.